>


True courtesy consists in that gentle refinement and grace of manner

displayed toward others, which springs not so much from polite culture

as from a genuine goodness of heart. It is the honor due to man as man,

and especially to woman. It is a grace which is too often unrecognized

and undervalued; but, when of the true order, it is a jewel of great

price.



It is to be found in all lands, and in every grade or order of society,

as shown by the following examples:



A Chinaman was rudely pushed into the mud by an American. He picked

himself up very calmly, shook off some of the mud, bowed very politely,

and said in a mild, reproving tone of voice, "You Christian; me heathen;

alle samee, good-bye." Courtesy, as a Christian duty, has been sorely

neglected by Americans. "If a civil word or two will make a man happy,"

said a French king, "he must be wretched indeed who will not give them

to him."



The first Duke of Marlborough "wrote English badly and spelled it

worse," yet he swayed the destinies of empires. The charm of his manner

was irresistible and influenced all Europe. His fascinating smile and

winning speech disarmed the fiercest hatred, and made friends of the

bitterest enemies.



A habit of courtesy is like a delicate wrapping, preventing one

personality from rubbing and chafing against another. It is perhaps most

of all proper from the young toward those who are older than themselves.

There is too little of this in our day. Boys and girls speak to their

elders, perhaps even to their parents, with rude familiarity, such as

would be hardly proper among playmates.



One should also show courtesy to his companions. Boys, even in their

play, should be courteous to one another. One who is always pushing for

the best, without regard to others, shows his ill breeding. A "thank

you" and a "please" on proper occasions, are not out of place even among

the closest companions.



Perhaps in the family, courtesy is more important than anywhere else.

There people are thrown more closely together; and, thus, nowhere do

they need more the protection of courtesy. From all this, it appears

that courtesy is simply an expression of thoughtfulness for others; and

that rudeness and boorishness, though sometimes they spring from

ignorance, are more often the expression of selfishness, which forgets

the feelings and the tastes of others.



When Edward Everett took a professor's chair at Harvard, after five

years of study in Europe, he was almost worshiped by the students. His

manner seemed touched by that exquisite grace seldom found except in

women of rare culture. His great popularity lay in a courteous and

magnetic atmosphere which every one felt, but no one could fully

describe, and which never left him throughout his long and useful life.



Courtesy, then, may be defined as "good manners." At present we use the

word "manners," simply to express the outward relations of life. We

speak of "good manners" or "bad manners," meaning by the words that a

person conforms more or less perfectly to what are called the "usages of

good society." Thus a man may have good morals and bad manners, or he

may have good manners and bad morals, or both his manners and his morals

may be either good or bad.



Etiquette originally meant the ticket or tag tied to a bag to indicate

its contents. If a bag had this ticket it was not examined. From this

the word passed to cards upon which were printed certain rules to be

observed by guests. These rules were "the ticket" or the etiquette. To

be "the ticket," or, as it was sometimes expressed, "to act or talk by

the card," became the thing with the better classes.



A fine manner more than compensates for all the defects of nature. The

most fascinating person is always the one of most winning manners, not

the one of greatest physical beauty. The Greeks thought beauty was a

proof of the peculiar favor of the gods, and considered that beauty

only worth adorning and transmitting which was unmarred by outward

manifestations of hard and haughty feeling. According to their ideal,

beauty must be the expression of attractive qualities within--such as

cheerfulness, benignity, contentment, and love.



On a certain occasion, Queen Victoria sent for Thomas Carlyle, who was

a Scotch peasant, offering him the title of nobleman, which he declined,

feeling that he had always been a nobleman in his own right. He

understood so little of the manners at court that, when presented to the

queen, after speaking to her a few minutes, being tired, he said, "Let

us sit down, madam, and talk it over;" whereat the courtiers were ready

to faint. But the queen was equal to the occasion and gave a gesture

that seated all her attendants in a moment.



Courtesy is not, however, always found in high places. Even royal courts

furnish many examples of bad manners. At an entertainment given by the

Prince of Wales, to which, of course, only the very cream of society was

admitted, there was such pushing and struggling to see the Princess, who

was then but recently married, that, as she passed through the reception

rooms, a bust of the princess Eoyal was thrown from its pedestal and

damaged, and the pedestal upset; and the ladies, in their eagerness to

see the princess, actually stood upon it.



Courtesy does not necessarily conflict with sincerity. It is a great

mistake to suppose that righteousness is bound up with bluntness and

criticism. Perfect courtesy and perfect honesty are often combined in

the same person. We can be amiable without being weak. We are able to

criticise errors and wrongs by holding up what is right and true, which

is the most forcible way; and still, through it all, our gentleness and

courtesy may remain unstained.



Where this course is departed from, we are very apt to fall into

trouble. A New York lady had just taken her seat in a car on a train

bound for Philadelphia, when a somewhat stout man sitting just ahead of

her lighted a cigar. She coughed and moved uneasily; but the hints had

no effect, so she said tartly: "You probably are a foreigner, and do not

know that there is a smoking-car attached to the train. Smoking is not

permitted here." The man made no reply, but threw his cigar out of the

window. What was her astonishment when the conductor told her, a moment

after, that she had entered the private car of General Grant. She

withdrew in confusion, but the same line courtesy which led him to give

up his cigar, was shown again as he spared her the mortification of

even a questioning glance, still less of a look of amusement, although

she watched his dumb, immovable figure with apprehension until she

reached the door.



Let us not be so busy as to forget the gracious acts and delicate

courtesies of everyday life. As Dr. Bartol says: "These friendly

good-mornings, these ownings of mutual ties, take on, in their mass, a

character of the sublime. The young owe respect to their elders. There

is a great deal of affection shown in our day, but the expression of

reverence is not so common. Good manners are not simply 'a fortune' to

a young person; they are more. They constitute the proof of a noble

character."





RALPH WALDO EMERSON.



In selecting Ralph Waldo Emerson as our special example, we are sure of

an admirable illustration. He was born in Boston, Massachusetts, on the

25th of May, 1803, the second of five sons. His father was the Rev.

William Emerson, minister of the First Church, in Boston. One of his

schoolmates says that as a youth, "it was impossible that there should

be any feeling about him but of regard and affection." His course and

graduation at Harvard College are remembered by his friends as marked

chiefly by amiability, meditation, and faultless conduct. He taught

school a short time and "made all the boys love him"; holding perfect

control beneath courteous manners.



Later on Emerson entered the ministry and became pastor of a church in

Boston. He was greatly beloved by all who knew him. The cause of this

universal affection was not solely in the books he produced, but in the

wonderful courtesy of his character, as it faced toward life in every

relation.



His son, Edward W. Emerson, says: "My father's honor for humanity, and

respect for humble people and for labor, were strong characteristics. To

servants, he was kindly and delicately considerate; always fearful lest

their feelings might be wounded. He built his own fires, going to the

woodpile in the yard in all weather for armfuls of wood as occasion

required." He then adds, "Nothing could be better than his manner to

children and young people; affectionate, and with a marked respect for

their personality."



Never patronizing, always appreciative, he touched everybody with

courtesy, and was, as Matthew Arnold said, "The friend of those who live

in the spirit of high, generous standards." We see in his example what

deep, real courtesy is. Courtesy, to him, was sincerity, and fairness,

and good-will, all round. He welcomed shy merit, encouraged clumsyyouth,

and smiled on good intentions, however poorly expressed. He did

all this day after day at the cost of time and patience and strength. As

a scholar, he might have secluded himself and simply written great

books; but the power he is, and is to be, could not have been obtained

that way.



[Footnote: See "Ralph Waldo Emerson," by O. W. Holmes (Boston, 1884);

"Emerson at Home and Abroad," by H. D. Conway; and F. B. Sanborn's

"Homes and Haunts of Emerson."]