"Yes, he's one of those men that don't know how to manage.

Good situation. Regular income. Quite enough for luxuries

as well as needs. Not really extravagant. And yet the fellow's

always in difficulties. Somehow he gets nothing out of his

money. Excellent flat--half empty! Always looks as if he'd had

the brokers in. New suit--old hat! Magnificent necktie--baggy

trousers! Asks you to dinner: cut glass--bad mu
ton, or Turkish

coffee--cracked cup! He can't understand it. Explanation simply

is that he fritters his income away. Wish I had the half of it!

I'd show him--"

So we have most of us criticised, at one time or another, in our

superior way.

We are nearly all chancellors of the exchequer: it is the pride of

the moment. Newspapers are full of articles explaining how to live

on such-and-such a sum, and these articles provoke a correspondence

whose violence proves the interest they excite. Recently, in a

daily organ, a battle raged round the question whether a woman can

exist nicely in the country on L85 a year. I have seen an essay,

"How to live on eight shillings a week." But I have never seen an

essay, "How to live on twenty-four hours a day." Yet it has been

said that time is money. That proverb understates the case. Time

is a great deal more than money. If you have time you can obtain

money--usually. But though you have the wealth of a cloak-room

attendant at the Carlton Hotel, you cannot buy yourself a minute

more time than I have, or the cat by the fire has.

Philosophers have explained space. They have not explained time.

It is the inexplicable raw material of everything. With it, all is

possible; without it, nothing. The supply of time is truly a daily

miracle, an affair genuinely astonishing when one examines it. You

wake up in the morning, and lo! your purse is magically filled with

twenty-four hours of the unmanufactured tissue of the universe of

your life! It is yours. It is the most precious of possessions. A

highly singular commodity, showered upon you in a manner as singular

as the commodity itself!

For remark! No one can take it from you. It is unstealable. And

no one receives either more or less than you receive.

Talk about an ideal democracy! In the realm of time there is no

aristocracy of wealth, and no aristocracy of intellect. Genius is

never rewarded by even an extra hour a day. And there is no

punishment. Waste your infinitely precious commodity as much as you

will, and the supply will never be withheld from you. No mysterious

power will say:--"This man is a fool, if not a knave. He does not

deserve time; he shall be cut off at the meter." It is more certain

than consols, and payment of income is not affected by Sundays.

Moreover, you cannot draw on the future. Impossible to get into

debt! You can only waste the passing moment. You cannot waste

to-morrow; it is kept for you. You cannot waste the next hour; it

is kept for you.

I said the affair was a miracle. Is it not?

You have to live on this twenty-four hours of daily time. Out of it

you have to spin health, pleasure, money, content, respect, and the

evolution of your immortal soul. Its right use, its most effective

use, is a matter of the highest urgency and of the most thrilling

actuality. All depends on that. Your happiness--the elusive prize

that you are all clutching for, my friends!--depends on that.

Strange that the newspapers, so enterprising and up-to-date as they

are, are not full of "How to live on a given income of time,"

instead of "How to live on a given income of money"! Money is far

commoner than time. When one reflects, one perceives that money is

just about the commonest thing there is. It encumbers the earth in

gross heaps.

If one can't contrive to live on a certain income of money, one

earns a little more--or steals it, or advertises for it. One

doesn't necessarily muddle one's life because one can't quite manage

on a thousand pounds a year; one braces the muscles and makes it

guineas, and balances the budget. But if one cannot arrange that an

income of twenty-four hours a day shall exactly cover all proper

items of expenditure, one does muddle one's life definitely. The

supply of time, though gloriously regular, is cruelly restricted.

Which of us lives on twenty-four hours a day? And when I say

"lives," I do not mean exists, nor "muddles through." Which of us

is free from that uneasy feeling that the "great spending

departments" of his daily life are not managed as they ought to be?

Which of us is quite sure that his fine suit is not surmounted by a

shameful hat, or that in attending to the crockery he has forgotten

the quality of the food? Which of us is not saying to himself--

which of us has not been saying to himself all his life: "I shall

alter that when I have a little more time"?

We never shall have any more time. We have, and we have always had,

all the time there is. It is the realisation of this profound and

neglected truth (which, by the way, I have not discovered) that has

led me to the minute practical examination of daily time-